thingsidontrememberr: jontinmetree: ...

Monday, February 27, 2012

jontinmetree:

roryoconnor:

demonica:

still-storm:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.

Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.

She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.

It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.

It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

Guaranteed this inspires so many 16 year old shitheads to start adding girls’ vaginas onto Foursquare, just reinforcing the misogyny and ignorance further.

awful

that’s a pretty spot-on analysis. I wish I had seen this while I was still taking my marketing or advertising classes.

if kids would take the time to get tested for hiv instead of analyzing about advertisements maybe they wouldnt have to put some chicks poon up there to get peoples attention. the point is when you meet someone and have sex with them you dont know how many partners theyve had, so rubber up. its smart, responsible, and safe. next time maybe they can just write “this chick has slept with 19 other people” instead of checking her into foursquare so that people dont get upset

^that, but only that. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, everyone seriously needs to calm down.

The ad itself is really dumb and poorly thought out, but I’m 99% sure there’d be no controversy if it was a picture of a guy. I just think people need to take a few minutes to gather their thoughts before going off on the internet.